Still no outrage against the NYT from libs

I am still not seeing any outrage at all against the NYT for their continuous leaking of national security secrets. They are really starting to look extremely foolish for all their fits and hot air concerning the leaking of non-covert Valerie Plame. The hypocrisy is swirling around the country like toxic gas. The evidence is quickly moving toward irrefutable that the MSM did not give a rip at all about Valerie Plame, but were only interested in anything that might stick it to George Bush. This is such a huge blow to their credibility and yet they do not even seem to be aware of it. The next huge blow to their credibility as I have stated before will be if our marines are cleared in the Haditha controversy. (On a side note find an interesting websiteof one of the marines charged in the affair at Hamdaniya, Iraq. The website is innocentmarine.com)

In addition to the treasonous revelation of anti-terrorist tools such as the NSA wiretapping and International Wire Transfer monitoring, the New York Times NOW is revealing information on the negotiations between the US and Iraq on troop withdrawal. This is a very sensitive topic that yet again shows the Grey Lady's lust for Pulitzer Prizes at the likely cost of American lives. I would also say shame on any in a position on the US side that leaked this information to the NYT, but regardless the NYT bears full responsibility for their choice in printing.

Michelle Malkin reminds us of the posters that were created during WWII warning all to be careful of what they say as it might aid the enemy and cost American lives. The same holds true for the NYT and so a photoshop contest was launched to take some of those old posters and change them to today's context. I am including one of those in this post, but make sure you go and see the rest. The links are here and here and here.