Cold hard facts vs. lame innuendo

When you compare Republican and Democrat comments on the Karl Rove/Plame issue, it becomes obvious which side uses cold hard facts to support their claims and which side uses lame innuendo to throw on the wall hoping it will stick. Compare the following links. Print them out. Take a black permanent marker and mark out anything that is not supported by facts and/or documentation. Also eliminate anything that is not directly related to the issue. You will be left with a professionally written report, and a practically all black report. Think of a court of law. Which would be admitted into evidence and which would be assaulted with objections such as "Speculation", "Irrelavent", "Hear-Say", etc.

GOP Link: http://www.gop.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=5630

DNC Link: http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/07/empty_rhetoric.php