Congressman Wants to Drop a Dingleberry on United States

Rep. John Dingell has his sights on the money that you and I work so hard for under the ruse of fighting Global Warming. According to the NY Post:

Dealing with global warming will be painful, says one of the most powerful Democrats in Congress.

And he is proposing a recipe many people won't like - a 50-cent-a-gallon gasoline tax, a carbon tax and scaling back tax breaks for some home owners.

With gas prices already high and the housing market slowdown, Dingell wants to take steps that will really hit our wallet at the pump and cut an already ailing housing market off at the knees. Who knows what bad experiences Dingell had as a child to convert him into a sadist that likes to rub salt in wounds and kick people while they are down?

With this "Dingell-berry" the Democrats show once again how this Climate Change / Global Warming farce is designed for one thing: to separate more money from American citizens. The left refuses to do a cost-benefit analysis on the whole climate change shell game. Of my five global warming questions, they only bother with attempting to prove the first question. Recent exposure of corrupt data and contaminated weather stations (where more than half of the 25% analyzed don't meet federal guidelines) are beginning to cast doubt on the one point I have stipulated. They cannot prove man is the sole or even main cause of global warming. They can't prove the level of consequences, nor are they willing to concede the potential benefits of global warming in certain parts of the world. Most importantly they cannot prove that by taking more of our hard-earned money that they can do a darn thing to stop global warming or mitigate the consequences.

As always with posts on climate change, here are my five questions we need to answer before succumbing to Climate Change Alarmism:
1) Has it been proven that Global Warming is actually happening?
2) Has it been proven that Global Warming is caused by man-made greenhouse gases?
3) Has it been proven that Global Warming will cause catastrophic conditions that will result in massive human casualties?
4) Has it been proven that if 1-3 are correct that it is possible for man to prevent #3 by reducing or eliminating their output in greenhouse gases?
5) Just because 2-4 are unproven and likely a crock, does this excuse man's irresponsible polluting of the earth?